<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Importance of Programming Language Popularity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pragmattica.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/on-the-importance-of-programming-language-popularity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pragmattica.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/on-the-importance-of-programming-language-popularity/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:43:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://pragmattica.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/on-the-importance-of-programming-language-popularity/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmattica.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/on-the-importance-of-programming-language-popularity/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not certain, but I think readline is not included by default because of licensing stuff - the implementors don&#039;t want to be locked into GPL just to because of readline</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not certain, but I think readline is not included by default because of licensing stuff &#8211; the implementors don&#8217;t want to be locked into GPL just to because of readline</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Baird</title>
		<link>http://pragmattica.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/on-the-importance-of-programming-language-popularity/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>David Baird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmattica.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/on-the-importance-of-programming-language-popularity/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>There is a great tool you can use in Linux: rlwrap.  This wraps the input to programs in order to provide history and friendly readline capabilities.  &quot;rlwrap&quot; is probably the program that bnsmith is referring to.  To use rlwrap, just run it like this, e.g.,

rlwrap csi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a great tool you can use in Linux: rlwrap.  This wraps the input to programs in order to provide history and friendly readline capabilities.  &#8220;rlwrap&#8221; is probably the program that bnsmith is referring to.  To use rlwrap, just run it like this, e.g.,</p>
<p>rlwrap csi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnsmith</title>
		<link>http://pragmattica.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/on-the-importance-of-programming-language-popularity/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>bnsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmattica.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/on-the-importance-of-programming-language-popularity/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... the minimalism of the interpreter reflects the minimalism of the language. That thought hadn&#039;t occurred to me, but it makes sense. After writing this, I learned that there is actually a program that you can run on the command-line to give readline support to another program (which is pretty neat), but I had no idea that such a thing existed, and I&#039;ve been using Linux for years. My main concern is just that things are made as easy as possible for newbies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; the minimalism of the interpreter reflects the minimalism of the language. That thought hadn&#8217;t occurred to me, but it makes sense. After writing this, I learned that there is actually a program that you can run on the command-line to give readline support to another program (which is pretty neat), but I had no idea that such a thing existed, and I&#8217;ve been using Linux for years. My main concern is just that things are made as easy as possible for newbies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mychael</title>
		<link>http://pragmattica.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/on-the-importance-of-programming-language-popularity/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Mychael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pragmattica.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/on-the-importance-of-programming-language-popularity/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>It sounds like you need readline.  I know that Chicken Scheme has an &quot;egg&quot; (an extension module) that it can install to give you readline support (history, backspacing, everything you have come to expect from a terminal emulator).

More than being a downside of individual implementations, I think it&#039;s a reflection of the minimalism that is Scheme.

All that having been said, thank you for sharing your thoughts on Gambit.  I will take your suggestion and give it a spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you need readline.  I know that Chicken Scheme has an &#8220;egg&#8221; (an extension module) that it can install to give you readline support (history, backspacing, everything you have come to expect from a terminal emulator).</p>
<p>More than being a downside of individual implementations, I think it&#8217;s a reflection of the minimalism that is Scheme.</p>
<p>All that having been said, thank you for sharing your thoughts on Gambit.  I will take your suggestion and give it a spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
